Discussion:
Why Jews are fairer skinned than Palestinians
(too old to reply)
ginger
2004-02-29 23:10:03 UTC
Permalink
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.

In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.

Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.

That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.

Ginger
Eugene Kent
2004-02-29 23:25:31 UTC
Permalink
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Sheldon Liberman
2004-02-29 23:33:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
Post by Eugene Kent
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
amigocabal
2004-03-01 01:31:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
That is what Adolf Hitler said about his Aryan race of idiots!
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Susan Cohen
2004-03-01 03:05:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
What did she say that was any less fraudulent than anything he says??

Susan
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 03:30:27 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?

This is "staying ahead"???????
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Sheldon Liberman
2004-03-01 04:04:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 05:13:21 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:04:32 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Doesn't appear that you are "ahead" of anyone.
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Sheldon Liberman
2004-03-01 13:39:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:04:32 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Doesn't appear that you are "ahead" of anyone.
As if your opinion meant anything. I doubt you'd spend so much time
denegrating the Jews if you had high self-esteem. It's easy to see why
you wouldn't.
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 15:06:46 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:39:27 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:04:32 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Doesn't appear that you are "ahead" of anyone.
As if your opinion meant anything. I doubt you'd spend so much time
denegrating the Jews if you had high self-esteem. It's easy to see why
you wouldn't.
I didn't state opinions. What I stated were well-known facts---
(Facts that most people already know). You seem to be confusing
the "stating of facts" with denegration. I wasn't the one spouting
off and making ignorant statements like "jews are ahead" of others.
You did that.

You are ahead of no one.
Sheldon Liberman
2004-03-01 15:38:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:39:27 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:04:32 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Doesn't appear that you are "ahead" of anyone.
As if your opinion meant anything. I doubt you'd spend so much time
denegrating the Jews if you had high self-esteem. It's easy to see why
you wouldn't.
I didn't state opinions. What I stated were well-known facts---
(Facts that most people already know). You seem to be confusing
the "stating of facts" with denegration. I wasn't the one spouting
off and making ignorant statements like "jews are ahead" of others.
You did that.
I made that statement to one person who was clearly trying to discredit
Jews, which is when you entered the debate. However, I make note of the
fact that you're life's fulfillment seems to take the form of making
snide comments about the Jews and their apparent lack of popularity.
Post by not_over_the_hill
You are ahead of no one.
Far be it from me to intrude on your delusions.
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 19:14:26 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:38:52 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:39:27 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:04:32 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Doesn't appear that you are "ahead" of anyone.
As if your opinion meant anything. I doubt you'd spend so much time
denegrating the Jews if you had high self-esteem. It's easy to see why
you wouldn't.
I didn't state opinions. What I stated were well-known facts---
(Facts that most people already know). You seem to be confusing
the "stating of facts" with denegration. I wasn't the one spouting
off and making ignorant statements like "jews are ahead" of others.
You did that.
I made that statement to one person who was clearly trying to discredit
Jews, which is when you entered the debate. However, I make note of the
fact that you're life's fulfillment seems to take the form of making
snide comments about the Jews and their apparent lack of popularity.
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation. Making a statement to
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
You are ahead of no one.
Far be it from me to intrude on your delusions.
You got this one backwards, pal.
Count 1
2004-03-01 20:28:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation.
A lesson you've been taught very well over the years.

Making a statement to
Post by not_over_the_hill
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying there are
good reasons but never actually stating them) then its pretty clear what
that person is up to.


Would you like to see the archived posts of you calling jews those names?
Or do you remember them enough on your own?
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 21:52:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation.
A lesson you've been taught very well over the years.
Making a statement to
Post by not_over_the_hill
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying there are
good reasons but never actually stating them) then its pretty clear what
that person is up to.
Show me where I have called all jews are "greedy, seditious...."
Many are..... but not all.

You appear to be the lying bigot.
Post by Count 1
Would you like to see the archived posts of you calling jews those names?
Or do you remember them enough on your own?
Count 1
2004-03-01 22:30:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation.
A lesson you've been taught very well over the years.
Making a statement to
Post by not_over_the_hill
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying there are
good reasons but never actually stating them) then its pretty clear what
that person is up to.
Show me where I have called all jews are "greedy, seditious...."
I think people will get a good understadning of your real opinion of jews by
looking at these threads....

http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=g:thl236453886d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=gglhfvg2ra8sm37o49ji81hjpsn4dr1g33%404ax.com

http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=g:thl236453886d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=725hfvgcfiieae98b15jt1op2qv1bn7s2d%404ax.com

http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=ib5ckvsk70ugu276vi13mqitqp143vb8ap%404ax.com&rnum=9

From the last link;
"I suppose that you think there are no reasons for the fact that Israel
has been persecuted and run out of most countries who have allowed
their presence? That the world's people just can't stand jews for
no good reason. "
Post by not_over_the_hill
You appear to be the lying bigot.
I see you did need to see the archived posts.
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 23:36:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation.
A lesson you've been taught very well over the years.
Making a statement to
Post by not_over_the_hill
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying there
are
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Count 1
good reasons but never actually stating them) then its pretty clear what
that person is up to.
Show me where I have called all jews are "greedy, seditious...."
I think people will get a good understadning of your real opinion of jews by
looking at these threads....
http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=g:thl236453886d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=gglhfvg2ra8sm37o49ji81hjpsn4dr1g33%404ax.com
http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=g:thl236453886d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=725hfvgcfiieae98b15jt1op2qv1bn7s2d%404ax.com
http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=ib5ckvsk70ugu276vi13mqitqp143vb8ap%404ax.com&rnum=9
From the last link;
"I suppose that you think there are no reasons for the fact that Israel
has been persecuted and run out of most countries who have allowed
their presence? That the world's people just can't stand jews for
no good reason. "
Post by not_over_the_hill
You appear to be the lying bigot.
I see you did need to see the archived posts.
I stated facts.
I ask again...... what is the reason?
Do you think there is no reason that jews are hated?
There is absolutely no question: "many are greedy....."
Why would they be welcome one day and then not
welcome the next? For no reason?
Count 1
2004-03-01 23:43:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
I stated facts.
No, you didn't.
Post by not_over_the_hill
I ask again...... what is the reason?
For your fantasies? Insecurity caused by an overzealous mother, I imagine.
Post by not_over_the_hill
Do you think there is no reason that jews are hated?
I don't think jews are hated period.
Post by not_over_the_hill
There is absolutely no question: "many are greedy....."
All humans can exhibit greediness. To single 'jews' out for that is
disingenuous.
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 23:38:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation.
A lesson you've been taught very well over the years.
Making a statement to
Post by not_over_the_hill
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying there are
They are. Zionists admit this. This is one of the reasons for
wanting to claim a homeland of their own.
Post by Count 1
good reasons but never actually stating them) then its pretty clear what
that person is up to.
Then.... what are the reasons? Do people just don't like others with
big noses? (sarcasm)
Post by Count 1
Would you like to see the archived posts of you calling jews those names?
Or do you remember them enough on your own?
Count 1
2004-03-01 23:45:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation.
A lesson you've been taught very well over the years.
Making a statement to
Post by not_over_the_hill
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying there are
They are.
Proof?
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 23:57:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Count 1
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation.
A lesson you've been taught very well over the years.
Making a statement to
Post by not_over_the_hill
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying there
are
Post by Michael Ejercito
They are.
Proof?
So.... now you really want me to prove that the jews are
hated all over the world? About all one hears (from most)
jews is how they are so persecuted and how anti-jewishness
is pronounced all over Europe. How they can never get a fair
shake from the UN due to their hatred. How the world stood
by while 6M were gassed. Comeon? You really can't be
serious. Do you live under a rock?

You CAN"T have it both ways. Make up your mind. The jews
have either been persecuted for the last 2 thousand yrs or they
have not. Which is it? I guess it depends on your current
agenda which way you want to spin today, huh?
Count 1
2004-03-02 00:10:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Count 1
Post by Michael Ejercito
They are.
Proof?
So.... now you really want me to prove that the jews are
hated all over the world?
Yes - you stated it (repeatedly)...now you are being tasked to prove it.

Good luck.


About all one hears (from most)
Post by not_over_the_hill
jews is how they are so persecuted and how anti-jewishness
is pronounced all over Europe.
This is not proof.


How they can never get a fair
Post by not_over_the_hill
shake from the UN due to their hatred.
Also not a proof.


How the world stood
Post by not_over_the_hill
by while 6M were gassed. Comeon? You really can't be
serious. Do you live under a rock?
The world didn't stand by.
Post by not_over_the_hill
You CAN"T have it both ways. Make up your mind. The jews
have either been persecuted for the last 2 thousand yrs or they
have not.
And now you're changing the criteria of the challenge.
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-02 00:10:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Count 1
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Count 1
Post by Michael Ejercito
They are.
Proof?
So.... now you really want me to prove that the jews are
hated all over the world?
Yes - you stated it (repeatedly)...now you are being tasked to prove it.
Good luck.
About all one hears (from most)
Post by not_over_the_hill
jews is how they are so persecuted and how anti-jewishness
is pronounced all over Europe.
This is not proof.
How they can never get a fair
Post by not_over_the_hill
shake from the UN due to their hatred.
Also not a proof.
How the world stood
Post by not_over_the_hill
by while 6M were gassed. Comeon? You really can't be
serious. Do you live under a rock?
The world didn't stand by.
Post by not_over_the_hill
You CAN"T have it both ways. Make up your mind. The jews
have either been persecuted for the last 2 thousand yrs or they
have not.
And now you're changing the criteria of the challenge.
Ah.... they were being persecuted with love?
Susan Cohen
2004-03-02 00:41:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Count 1
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Count 1
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy, seditious,
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying
there
Post by Count 1
are
Post by Michael Ejercito
They are.
Proof?
Don't hold your breath.

Susan
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-02 03:25:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Count 1
Post by Count 1
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Count 1
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy,
seditious,
Post by Count 1
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Count 1
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying
there
Post by Count 1
are
Post by Michael Ejercito
They are.
Proof?
Don't hold your breath.
Susan
Now, you are saying that you have not been persecuted and hated
for the last 2,000 years.... and you would like proof that you have?

Youse guys just can't make up your minds whether you want
to be victims or not.... you are hysterical !!

Which do you want to be? If you've been loved and admired throughout
history, why all the talk about jews being persecuted by so many
peoples?

Step up and take your pick. Pick one.
Ed
2004-03-07 00:50:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Count 1
Post by Count 1
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:28:35 -0800, "Count 1"
Post by Count 1
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy,
seditious,
Post by Count 1
Post by Count 1
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying
there
Post by Count 1
are
They are.
Proof?
Don't hold your breath.
Susan
Now, you are saying that you have not been persecuted and hated
for the last 2,000 years.... and you would like proof that you have?
Youse guys just can't make up your minds whether you want
to be victims or not.... you are hysterical !!
Which do you want to be? If you've been loved and admired throughout
history, why all the talk about jews being persecuted by so many
peoples?
Step up and take your pick. Pick one.
Hey el stupido!

She wasn't asking for proof that Jews had been persecuted for 2000 years.

She was asking for proof that Jews are hated.

I hope this helped, seeing how your reading comprehension isn't above a
second grade level.
Susan Cohen
2004-03-07 06:00:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ed
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Count 1
Post by Count 1
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:28:35 -0800, "Count 1"
Post by Count 1
But when it comes from someone who likes to call jews greedy,
seditious,
Post by Count 1
Post by Count 1
evil, and allude to how hated they are all over the world (impying
there
Post by Count 1
are
They are.
Proof?
Don't hold your breath.
Susan
Now, you are saying that you have not been persecuted and hated
for the last 2,000 years.... and you would like proof that you have?
Is he an idiot, or just being evasive?
Post by Ed
Post by not_over_the_hill
Youse guys just can't make up your minds whether you want
to be victims or not.... you are hysterical !!
Which do you want to be? If you've been loved and admired throughout
history, why all the talk about jews being persecuted by so many
peoples?
Step up and take your pick. Pick one.
Hey el stupido!
She wasn't asking for proof that Jews had been persecuted for 2000 years.
She was asking for proof that Jews are hated.
Well, I was more asking him to prove *everything* that he said, knowing full
well that he couldn't.

Susan
Post by Ed
I hope this helped, seeing how your reading comprehension isn't above a
second grade level.
Sheldon Liberman
2004-03-01 21:07:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:38:52 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:39:27 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:04:32 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Doesn't appear that you are "ahead" of anyone.
As if your opinion meant anything. I doubt you'd spend so much time
denegrating the Jews if you had high self-esteem. It's easy to see why
you wouldn't.
I didn't state opinions. What I stated were well-known facts---
(Facts that most people already know). You seem to be confusing
the "stating of facts" with denegration. I wasn't the one spouting
off and making ignorant statements like "jews are ahead" of others.
You did that.
I made that statement to one person who was clearly trying to discredit
Jews, which is when you entered the debate. However, I make note of the
fact that you're life's fulfillment seems to take the form of making
snide comments about the Jews and their apparent lack of popularity.
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
Your criticism is valueless. It is not meant as constructive, and is, in
truth, motivated by racial bias.
Post by not_over_the_hill
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation. Making a statement to
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
I gave you an explanation and either by choice or by inability to
comprehend chose to ignore it. You can disagree with the doctrine of
zionism, but to label someone who takes the opposing view a "zio-nazi"
is to open yourself up to anything the zionest can concoct from the
English language.

Moreover, I said "ahead", you added the word "far", thereby illustrating
another racist tactic: distorting the statement and then basing your
reply on the distortion. In so doing, you've effectively fulfilled your
own prophecy; you've fallen further behind thereby making the word "far"
more appropriate.
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
You are ahead of no one.
Far be it from me to intrude on your delusions.
You got this one backwards, pal.
No, but your perception of such is part of the delusion.
not_over_the_hill
2004-03-01 21:55:20 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:07:47 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:38:52 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:39:27 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:04:32 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:33:14 -0500, Sheldon Liberman
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by Eugene Kent
You zionazis get dumber and dumber.
...and yet somehow manage to stay ahead of you and your kind.
"Staying ahead" ? Is this what you call it when a tribe of people
have been kicked out of numerous countries only to settle in a
land populated by others and now find themselfs hated and despised
by virtually all of their neighbors? Relying upon the largess and
kindness of some missguided zionist Christian's millions/billions of
dollars in order to secure their existence?
This is "staying ahead"???????
Close enough. Any problem people have with the Jews--and you exagerate
the magnituded--is their problem, not ours. You blame the victims for no
other reason than being Jewish, showing yourselves to be the moral
degenerates you are. Not that your act is anything new. It does,
however, make the Arabs the perfect obects for your misguided empathies.
Doesn't appear that you are "ahead" of anyone.
As if your opinion meant anything. I doubt you'd spend so much time
denegrating the Jews if you had high self-esteem. It's easy to see why
you wouldn't.
I didn't state opinions. What I stated were well-known facts---
(Facts that most people already know). You seem to be confusing
the "stating of facts" with denegration. I wasn't the one spouting
off and making ignorant statements like "jews are ahead" of others.
You did that.
I made that statement to one person who was clearly trying to discredit
Jews, which is when you entered the debate. However, I make note of the
fact that you're life's fulfillment seems to take the form of making
snide comments about the Jews and their apparent lack of popularity.
I will take note of the fact that you don't take criticism well.
Your criticism is valueless. It is not meant as constructive, and is, in
truth, motivated by racial bias.
You are entitled to you silly-ass opinion.
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
When someone makes asinine statements, they should be ready for
a challenge or at least an explanation. Making a statement to
someone that jews are "far ahead" is an example. Implying that
someone is "anti-jewish" when that statement is challenged is absurd.
I gave you an explanation and either by choice or by inability to
comprehend chose to ignore it. You can disagree with the doctrine of
zionism, but to label someone who takes the opposing view a "zio-nazi"
is to open yourself up to anything the zionest can concoct from the
English language.
Not when the shoe fits.
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Moreover, I said "ahead", you added the word "far", thereby illustrating
another racist tactic: distorting the statement and then basing your
reply on the distortion. In so doing, you've effectively fulfilled your
own prophecy; you've fallen further behind thereby making the word "far"
more appropriate.
Post by not_over_the_hill
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by not_over_the_hill
You are ahead of no one.
Far be it from me to intrude on your delusions.
You got this one backwards, pal.
No, but your perception of such is part of the delusion.
torresD
2004-03-02 18:16:59 UTC
Permalink
Do Ashkenazi Jews marry Sephardic Jews on a regular basis?

How often to Ethiopian Jews marry Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Russian
Jews?
Lynn K. Circle
2004-03-01 00:40:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Of course, there's another reason too often overlooked by racists. It's the
reason my father was blond and blue-eyed: His grandmother had been raped by
Cossacks during one of the Russian pogroms.

The truth is (and obvious to anyone who ever visits Israel) is that the idea
of a Jewish phenotype is a myth. Jews look like Italians, Russians, Indians
(from India), and blacks from Africa. There are some who appear nearly
Chinese and others who could pass unquestioned as natives in nordic nations.
Yet, the greatest probability of how the Jews might have looked and lived in
Mosaic times can be seen by observing the daily life of Beduins.

Lynn Circle
amigocabal
2004-03-01 01:35:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn K. Circle
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Of course, there's another reason too often overlooked by racists. It's the
reason my father was blond and blue-eyed: His grandmother had been raped by
Cossacks during one of the Russian pogroms.
Your grandmothers and mine have been raped by Mongols for 500 years. Tht is
why Adolf Sharon looks little like the Great Khan of the Steppe!
Post by Lynn K. Circle
The truth is (and obvious to anyone who ever visits Israel) is that the idea
of a Jewish phenotype is a myth. Jews look like Italians, Russians, Indians
(from India), and blacks from Africa.
Which means that they are not semites at all!

There are some who appear nearly
Post by Lynn K. Circle
Chinese and others who could pass unquestioned as natives in nordic nations.
Yet, the greatest probability of how the Jews might have looked and lived in
Mosaic times can be seen by observing the daily life of Beduins.
Lynn Circl
Maybe that is why IDF is spraying the crops of the Bedu and expelling them
from the land they have shared with sand for milleniums!
amigocabal
2004-03-01 01:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
And who, in your wisdom, was in Palestine, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi
Arabia BEFORE 635 AD?
Phantoms? Arab trade routes stretch all the way to china from present day
Syria and Palestine. I guess you do not know who Batuta is, either? It is
Arabs who have taught naviga=tion to Europeans and Columbus, himself.

As for the fair skinned Jews. They are fair skinned becauise they have no
connection to Palestine or Middle East, or Israelites, at all. They are
European converts to Judaism!
Sheldon Liberman
2004-03-01 01:55:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by amigocabal
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
And who, in your wisdom, was in Palestine, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi
Arabia BEFORE 635 AD?
Phantoms? Arab trade routes stretch all the way to china from present day
Syria and Palestine. I guess you do not know who Batuta is, either? It is
Arabs who have taught naviga=tion to Europeans and Columbus, himself.
As for the fair skinned Jews. They are fair skinned becauise they have no
connection to Palestine or Middle East, or Israelites, at all. They are
European converts to Judaism!
And I suspect people like you are used by the Darwinists to prove the
link between man and ape, a theory strongly opposed by all
self-respecting apes.
amigocabal
2004-03-01 02:58:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sheldon Liberman
Post by amigocabal
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
And who, in your wisdom, was in Palestine, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi
Arabia BEFORE 635 AD?
Phantoms? Arab trade routes stretch all the way to china from present day
Syria and Palestine. I guess you do not know who Batuta is, either? It is
Arabs who have taught naviga=tion to Europeans and Columbus, himself.
As for the fair skinned Jews. They are fair skinned becauise they have no
connection to Palestine or Middle East, or Israelites, at all. They are
European converts to Judaism!
And I suspect people like you are used by the Darwinists to prove the
link between man and ape, a theory strongly opposed by all
self-respecting apes.
WE CAN EASILY PROVE CONNECTION BETWEEN YOU AND AN APE, IT IS THE NOSE!
JGB
2004-03-01 03:18:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them. Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger<
YOu are most correct, but there is more. The Arabs claim descent
from Abraham and Hagar, who was a servant girl fron Egypt, and most likely
a Nubian. By contrast, Isaac comes from Sarah, a Sumerian like Abraham.
But there are black Jews, mainly from Ethiopia, and darker skinned
JEws from the Arab countries as well. There was always SOME mixing in the
diaspora, even if only from rapine alone. IF one lives in ISrael one
will see Jews of every hue.
Lisa R.
2004-03-01 03:21:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
I suppose that Ethiopian Jews aren't Negroids, huh?

Start looking closely at pictures of Palestinians. You'll find that
they are quite mixed racially. Some look almost European, and some
are stereotypically Middle Eastern, and have strong features, dark
skins and heavy brows. And some Palestinians have a lot of African
ancestry.

But then again, so what? The problem with Palestinians isn't in their
genes; it's in their ideology, which is absolutely poisonous, in some
cases.


Lisa
Michael Ejercito
2004-03-01 16:31:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lisa R.
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
I suppose that Ethiopian Jews aren't Negroids, huh?
They are. The Jews who settled in Ethiopia took the native's
daughters for their sons, and gave their daughters to the sons of the
natives.


Michael
ginger
2004-03-01 09:56:52 UTC
Permalink
***@hotmail.com (ginger) wrote in message news:<***@posting.google.com>...

In answer to pro Palestinian posters: who say the jews of today
look different from the people in the neighbouring countries,
and therefore have no antecedents in the middle east.

The point to be made here is, there were other fair skinned
peoples in the Middle east and North Africa, and a remnant of
them still survives to the present day. The Berbers of the Kabyle
area of the Atlas mountains are more Skandinavian in their looks
than what we think of as North African.

If you want peace in the Middle east, then the Arab/Muslim world
has to acknowledge other people's right to exist.

22 countries and huge influential hostile colonies in the west
and elsewhere, that are liable to turn savage at any moment.

Excuse me for existing, but I have a place on this planet too.

Ginger
r***@bellsouth.net
2004-03-02 00:46:59 UTC
Permalink
ROFLOL you know nothing of anything about Israelis/ we are of all races,
including BLACKS North Africans Yemeni etc. yet you claim we are all lily
white. Dumb ass
--
"I have seen the worst that man can do.and I can still laugh loudly"
R.J. Goldman

http://www.usidfvets.com
Post by ginger
In answer to pro Palestinian posters: who say the jews of today
look different from the people in the neighbouring countries,
and therefore have no antecedents in the middle east.
The point to be made here is, there were other fair skinned
peoples in the Middle east and North Africa, and a remnant of
them still survives to the present day. The Berbers of the Kabyle
area of the Atlas mountains are more Skandinavian in their looks
than what we think of as North African.
If you want peace in the Middle east, then the Arab/Muslim world
has to acknowledge other people's right to exist.
22 countries and huge influential hostile colonies in the west
and elsewhere, that are liable to turn savage at any moment.
Excuse me for existing, but I have a place on this planet too.
Ginger
buggerzion
2004-03-01 10:05:25 UTC
Permalink
Bullshit Ginger/

Bugger
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
YULKA
2004-03-01 13:42:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by buggerzion
Bullshit Ginger/
Actualy she is right! General Romel's Army left a trail of Blonde Arab
Villages.
But even before that the Crusaders and Vikings. Not to mention White Slaves.
Post by buggerzion
Bugger
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Deborah Sharavi
2004-03-01 22:25:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
Palestinian Arab:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs

Israeli Jew:
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
Israeli Jews:
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm

Deborah
Norma
2004-03-01 22:53:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
Very nice... It is so hard to tell who is who a lot of the time anywhere in
the world, including Israel. Norma
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Deborah
Deborah Sharavi
2004-03-04 18:56:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Norma
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
Very nice... It is so hard to tell who is who a lot of the time anywhere in
the world, including Israel. Norma
Imagine the problems for aliens who evolved from, say, aardvarks.

As the liturgy goes, G-d took Israel from all peoples.

Deborah
CW
2004-03-04 19:03:34 UTC
Permalink
This thread is just bizarre. There are Jews originating from every corner
of the world, and of every ethnic and racial composition.

No one really cares about skin color except "gingersmiff" and some oddball
racial bigots.

CW
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
2004-03-05 06:21:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by CW
This thread is just bizarre. There are Jews originating from every corner
of the world, and of every ethnic and racial composition.
No there aren't.
Post by CW
No one really cares about skin color except "gingersmiff" and some oddball
racial bigots.
Jews are very careful not to live too near the schvartzes.
David T
2004-03-04 21:03:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a Falash
Mura Jew?
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
2004-03-05 06:22:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a Falash
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Lisa R.
2004-03-05 16:21:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a Falash
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar. There's some
question about the sincerity of some of them:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/F/Falashas.asp


Lisa
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
2004-03-05 16:56:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a Falash
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar.
Um, only after their forced conversions, twat.
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they used
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Lisa R.
2004-03-06 14:18:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a Falash
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar.
Um, only after their forced conversions, twat.
Forced conversions? Who are you, Free Palestine's alter ego?

They've been officially recognized as Jews for some time, jerk:

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/ejhist.html

Now don't go and snip that URL, Dingleberry Chaser.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they used
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.



Lisa
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
2004-03-06 20:42:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a Falash
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar.
Um, only after their forced conversions, twat.
Forced conversions? Who are you, Free Palestine's alter ego?
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/ejhist.html
Now don't go and snip that URL, Dingleberry Chaser.
Now there's a credible source: us-israel.org. Or should that be
us=israel.org?
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they used
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.
No, the 'Israelis' forced the Ethiopians to become jews because their
jew origins were suspect, twat.

What the fuck are you doing in a serious (i.e. men's) newsgroup
anyway?
Norma
2004-03-06 20:57:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a Falash
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar.
Um, only after their forced conversions, twat.
Forced conversions? Who are you, Free Palestine's alter ego?
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/ejhist.html
Now don't go and snip that URL, Dingleberry Chaser.
Now there's a credible source: us-israel.org. Or should that be
us=israel.org?
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they used
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.
No, the 'Israelis' forced the Ethiopians to become jews because their
jew origins were suspect, twat.
What the fuck are you doing in a serious (i.e. men's) newsgroup
anyway?
Better trim the groups if you really feel that way. Norma
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
2004-03-06 20:57:48 UTC
Permalink
Sharavi)
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived
in
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the
jews.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the
middle
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrhs
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a
Falash
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by David T
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar.
Um, only after their forced conversions, twat.
Forced conversions? Who are you, Free Palestine's alter ego?
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/ejhist.html
Now don't go and snip that URL, Dingleberry Chaser.
Now there's a credible source: us-israel.org. Or should that be
us=israel.org?
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they used
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.
No, the 'Israelis' forced the Ethiopians to become jews because their
jew origins were suspect, twat.
What the fuck are you doing in a serious (i.e. men's) newsgroup
anyway?
Better trim the groups if you really feel that way. Norma
They're *all* serious newsgroups, Blankenstein.
Norma
2004-03-06 21:15:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:03:37 GMT, David T
Sharavi)
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived
in
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the
jews.
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the
middle
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrh
s
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a
Falash
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that the
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are routinely
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar.
Um, only after their forced conversions, twat.
Forced conversions? Who are you, Free Palestine's alter ego?
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/ejhist.html
Now don't go and snip that URL, Dingleberry Chaser.
Now there's a credible source: us-israel.org. Or should that be
us=israel.org?
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they used
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.
No, the 'Israelis' forced the Ethiopians to become jews because their
jew origins were suspect, twat.
What the fuck are you doing in a serious (i.e. men's) newsgroup
anyway?
Better trim the groups if you really feel that way. Norma
They're *all* serious newsgroups, Blankenstein.
Then expect women to participate. Norma
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
2004-03-07 05:33:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by ginger
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:03:37 GMT, David T
Sharavi)
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never
arrived
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
in
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the
jews.
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred
with
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of
the
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
middle
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by ginger
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/12/1076548163989.html?from=storyrh
s
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Post by Deborah Sharavi
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/search/thumb/2110
Post by ginger
There is no negroid strain in the jews.
Ginger
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/photo_gallery_sigd2003.htm
And what would the idiot say if he actually saw a picture of a
Falash
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by David T
Mura Jew?
The Ashkenazi chief jew of 'Israel' refuses to acknowledge that
the
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
"falashas" are jews to this very day. The schvartzes are
routinely
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
forced to 'convert'.
Um, they're officially recognized as Jews, liar.
Um, only after their forced conversions, twat.
Forced conversions? Who are you, Free Palestine's alter ego?
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/ejhist.html
Now don't go and snip that URL, Dingleberry Chaser.
Now there's a credible source: us-israel.org. Or should that be
us=israel.org?
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they
used
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Deborah Sharavi
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.
No, the 'Israelis' forced the Ethiopians to become jews because their
jew origins were suspect, twat.
What the fuck are you doing in a serious (i.e. men's) newsgroup
anyway?
Better trim the groups if you really feel that way. Norma
They're *all* serious newsgroups, Blankenstein.
Then expect women to participate. Norma
I do, Blankenstein. By maintaining their silence.
Susan Cohen
2004-03-07 05:58:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Norma
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they used
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.
No, the 'Israelis' forced the Ethiopians to become jews because their
jew origins were suspect, twat.
What the fuck are you doing in a serious (i.e. men's) newsgroup
anyway?
Translation: the twat is getting his butt kicked yet again, & absolutely
cannot handle it (as usual).

Susan
Post by Norma
Better trim the groups if you really feel that way. Norma
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
2004-03-07 06:14:23 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 05:58:00 GMT, "Suzy the convert"
Post by Susan Cohen
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
There's some
There's some question about the sincerity of *all* of them: they
used
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Post by Lisa R.
Post by The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
'Israel' as a stepping stone to their ultimate destination, the USA.
Yeah, right. Israelis forced Ethiopians to become Jews so they could
come to America.
No, the 'Israelis' forced the Ethiopians to become jews because their
jew origins were suspect, twat.
What the fuck are you doing in a serious (i.e. men's) newsgroup
anyway?
Translation: the twat is getting his butt kicked yet again, & absolutely
cannot handle it (as usual).
Suzy
What was that you were saying about bad language, cunt?

"In this instance, I might be tempted to apply the term those who
can't read a simple header, & who pretend that my language is as bad
as theirs, but, I prefer not to use that type of language on Usenet."

Does the word "hypocrite" mean anything to you, shitske?

George
2004-03-01 23:18:04 UTC
Permalink
Does that apply to the Ethiopian Jews, the Lost Tribe?
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Gabe
2004-03-02 04:06:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by George
Does that apply to the Ethiopian Jews, the Lost Tribe?
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
I for one was suprised by the mixed racial features of the Israelis
and their likeness to not just Palestinian Arabs but other peoples of
that region. Perhaps a little like Malcom X was surprised that the
Arabs who greeted him in Saudia Arabia were what he considered as
white as any American honkey (not his exact words). I saw not only
Ethopian Jews, but Yemeni, Iraqi, Indian, Iranian, and Kurdish Jews
who did not resemble, say, Jerry Seinfeld.
Susan Cohen
2004-03-02 05:17:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gabe
I for one was suprised by the mixed racial features of the Israelis
and their likeness to not just Palestinian Arabs but other peoples of
that region. Perhaps a little like Malcom X was surprised that the
Arabs who greeted him in Saudia Arabia were what he considered as
white as any American honkey (not his exact words).
No, he was speaking of *Muslims* that he met on the Hajj, not just Arabs.
It was his great epiphany.

Susan

I saw not only
Post by Gabe
Ethopian Jews, but Yemeni, Iraqi, Indian, Iranian, and Kurdish Jews
who did not resemble, say, Jerry Seinfeld.
r***@bellsouth.net
2004-03-02 12:44:35 UTC
Permalink
I seem to remember blond blue eyed and some ever Redheaded Pals in Jerusalem
Gaza and other areas ,,, but then these twit like under the hill and yas
etc will deny it
--
"I have seen the worst that man can do.and I can still laugh loudly"
R.J. Goldman

http://www.usidfvets.com
Post by Susan Cohen
Post by Gabe
I for one was suprised by the mixed racial features of the Israelis
and their likeness to not just Palestinian Arabs but other peoples of
that region. Perhaps a little like Malcom X was surprised that the
Arabs who greeted him in Saudia Arabia were what he considered as
white as any American honkey (not his exact words).
No, he was speaking of *Muslims* that he met on the Hajj, not just Arabs.
It was his great epiphany.
Susan
I saw not only
Post by Gabe
Ethopian Jews, but Yemeni, Iraqi, Indian, Iranian, and Kurdish Jews
who did not resemble, say, Jerry Seinfeld.
Iskandar Baharuddin
2004-03-02 13:36:54 UTC
Permalink
<***@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:xg%0c.7783$***@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
| I seem to remember blond blue eyed and some ever Redheaded
Pals in Jerusalem
| Gaza and other areas ,,, but then these twit like under
the hill and yas
| etc will deny it
|
| --
| "I have seen the worst that man can do.and I can still
laugh loudly"
| R.J. Goldman
|
| http://www.usidfvets.com
| "Susan Cohen" <***@verizon.net> wrote in message
| news:ONU0c.22360$***@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
| >
| > "Gabe" <***@cc.owu.edu> wrote in message
| > news:***@posting.google.com...
| > >
| > > I for one was suprised by the mixed racial features of
the Israelis
| > > and their likeness to not just Palestinian Arabs but
other peoples of
| > > that region. Perhaps a little like Malcom X was
surprised that the
| > > Arabs who greeted him in Saudia Arabia were what he
considered as
| > > white as any American honkey (not his exact words).
| >
| > No, he was speaking of *Muslims* that he met on the
Hajj, not just Arabs.
| > It was his great epiphany.
| >
| > Susan
| >
| > I saw not only
| > > Ethopian Jews, but Yemeni, Iraqi, Indian, Iranian, and
Kurdish Jews
| > > who did not resemble, say, Jerry Seinfeld.
| >
Isn't Jerry a Kurdish Jew"

Izzy
Lisa R.
2004-03-05 16:24:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iskandar Baharuddin
| I seem to remember blond blue eyed and some ever Redheaded
Pals in Jerusalem
| Gaza and other areas ,,, but then these twit like under
the hill and yas
| etc will deny it
|
| --
| "I have seen the worst that man can do.and I can still
laugh loudly"
| R.J. Goldman
|
| http://www.usidfvets.com
| >
| > >
| > > I for one was suprised by the mixed racial features of
the Israelis
| > > and their likeness to not just Palestinian Arabs but
other peoples of
| > > that region. Perhaps a little like Malcom X was
surprised that the
| > > Arabs who greeted him in Saudia Arabia were what he
considered as
| > > white as any American honkey (not his exact words).
| >
| > No, he was speaking of *Muslims* that he met on the
Hajj, not just Arabs.
| > It was his great epiphany.
| >
| > Susan
| >
| > I saw not only
| > > Ethopian Jews, but Yemeni, Iraqi, Indian, Iranian, and
Kurdish Jews
| > > who did not resemble, say, Jerry Seinfeld.
| >
Isn't Jerry a Kurdish Jew"
Izzy
I think his mother is a Syrian Jew. But I'm not sure.

Lisa
Lisa R.
2004-03-05 16:23:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gabe
Post by George
Does that apply to the Ethiopian Jews, the Lost Tribe?
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
I for one was suprised by the mixed racial features of the Israelis
and their likeness to not just Palestinian Arabs but other peoples of
that region. Perhaps a little like Malcom X was surprised that the
Arabs who greeted him in Saudia Arabia were what he considered as
white as any American honkey (not his exact words). I saw not only
Ethopian Jews, but Yemeni, Iraqi, Indian, Iranian, and Kurdish Jews
who did not resemble, say, Jerry Seinfeld.
This is all quite true. And, if you take a close look at the
Palestinians, you'll find that they're mixed, too.

Lisa
krishan
2004-03-03 18:59:06 UTC
Permalink
To most people, all mankind comes from the negro, so then you came from
the polar bear?, a white monkey strain? a snowy dog?

krishan
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Lord Whiz
2004-03-03 23:06:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by krishan
To most people, all mankind comes from the negro, so then you came from
the polar bear?, a white monkey strain? a snowy dog?
---

You need to learn how to read your own words .... "most people"?
Since how are you the spokesman for 'most people', and how do you
even know that 'most people' think that way?

Just curious.

But, then you surmise that the original poster is a ... polar bear?
A snowy dog? A white monkey? Do you claim to be a serious
poster?

The original poster is merely reflecting the known history of the
ancient world. Arabs and African black races did not arrive in the
middle east region known as Palestine or Israel of today until much, much
later than the Jews ... whom are descendant from Abraham, as was
Ishmael, born of Haggar. Not all people were born of Abraham, since
after all he also had a mother and father. These northern races were not
from Africa. Are you confusing the word Arab with Muslim? Arabs came from
Arab-ia .. get it? Muslims are adherents to Islam, a religion started
by a successful warrior named Mohammed, born 570 AD ...in Arabia.
He is credited with composing the Koran, yet there is modern difficulty
in reconciling the seeming peace of the Koran, with modern Islam, and
the knowledge of what such a man was Mohammed ... and of course,
the barbaric and bloodthirsty actions of some claiming to be Muslim.
One does corroborate the other. Arabs are historically war-like, although
they have had periods of art, culture, and tolerance. Do not confuse them
with Persians who were wizards of science, mathematics, and medicine.
The Jewish faith precedes all islam and muslims by some 3000 years,
more or less.

Not all Muslims are arab, either. Consider the peoples of Iran. Many
living there are probably derived from the Medes and Persian of
Nebucadrezzar's day. Daniel (of the lion's den, and the firey furnace?)
was a Jewish slave in that area. Most all Jews were slaves in that
area at that time. Why? That is part of the history and story that all
people should read for themselves.

Despite the unproven 'science' that all of mankind was derived from
sources in or around Olduvai gorge in Africa, there are yet much more
believable answers that all life began in Mesapotamia, centering upon
which is today ... southern Iraq. Simply because one or two godless
scientists proclaim "this is what 'must' have happened" ... the premise
they utter revolves upon that word .. 'must'. The reason of the popularity
of the Olduvai gorge story is simply that ... science MUST have some
sort of human answer such that *man* is in control. The truth likely is ...
that one supreme engineer conjured it all, and He is ultimately in
control. We shall find out one day, won't we!?

Give education a try. Read some history. Read some scripture.
It may be difficult to discern on your own, but there is plenty of help.
Susan Cohen
2004-03-04 17:55:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lord Whiz
Post by krishan
To most people, all mankind comes from the negro, so then you came from
the polar bear?, a white monkey strain? a snowy dog?
---
You need to learn how to read your own words .... "most people"?
Since how are you the spokesman for 'most people', and how do you
even know that 'most people' think that way?
He is giving all of us the benefit of the doubt.
Post by Lord Whiz
Just curious.
But, then you surmise that the original poster is a ... polar bear?
A snowy dog? A white monkey? Do you claim to be a serious
poster?
It's called "sarcasm".
Post by Lord Whiz
The original poster is merely reflecting the known history of the
ancient world. Arabs and African black races did not arrive in the
middle east region known as Palestine or Israel of today until much, much
later than the Jews ... whom are descendant from Abraham, as was
Ishmael, born of Haggar. Not all people were born of Abraham, since
after all he also had a mother and father. These northern races were not
from Africa. Are you confusing the word Arab with Muslim? Arabs came from
Arab-ia .. get it? Muslims are adherents to Islam, a religion started
by a successful warrior named Mohammed, born 570 AD ...in Arabia.
He is credited with composing the Koran, yet there is modern difficulty
in reconciling the seeming peace of the Koran, with modern Islam, and
the knowledge of what such a man was Mohammed ... and of course,
the barbaric and bloodthirsty actions of some claiming to be Muslim.
One does corroborate the other. Arabs are historically war-like, although
they have had periods of art, culture, and tolerance. Do not confuse them
with Persians who were wizards of science, mathematics, and medicine.
The Jewish faith precedes all islam and muslims by some 3000 years,
more or less.
Not all Muslims are arab, either. Consider the peoples of Iran. Many
living there are probably derived from the Medes and Persian of
Nebucadrezzar's day. Daniel (of the lion's den, and the firey furnace?)
was a Jewish slave in that area. Most all Jews were slaves in that
area at that time. Why? That is part of the history and story that all
people should read for themselves.
Despite the unproven 'science' that all of mankind was derived from
sources in or around Olduvai gorge in Africa, there are yet much more
believable answers that all life began in Mesapotamia, centering upon
which is today ... southern Iraq. Simply because one or two godless
scientists proclaim "this is what 'must' have happened"
Uh, hardly that.

... the premise
Post by Lord Whiz
they utter revolves upon that word .. 'must'. The reason of the popularity
of the Olduvai gorge story is simply that ... science MUST have some
sort of human answer such that *man* is in control.
Not at all.
Scince is only searching for the truth.
Most scientists I know are very religious, & find no contradiction in being
both.
It was Stephen Hawking himself who said that the closer scientists get to
the start of the Universe, the closer we get to biblical accounts (WTTE, of
course).

The truth likely is ...
Post by Lord Whiz
that one supreme engineer conjured it all, and He is ultimately in
control. We shall find out one day, won't we!?
Who is to say that He didn't have evolution as His tool???

Susan
Post by Lord Whiz
Give education a try. Read some history. Read some scripture.
It may be difficult to discern on your own, but there is plenty of help.
Lord Whiz
2004-03-04 19:35:04 UTC
Permalink
... the premise they utter revolves upon that word .. 'must'. The reason
of the
popularity of the Olduvai gorge story is simply that ... science MUST
have some
sort of human answer such that *man* is in control.
Saith Susan: Not at all.
Science is only searching for the truth.
Most scientists I know are very religious, & find no
contradiction in being both.

It was Stephen Hawking himself who said that the
closer scientists get to the start of the Universe, the
closer
we get to biblical accounts (WTTE, of course).
The truth likely is ...
that one supreme engineer conjured it all, and He is ultimately in
control. We shall find out one day, won't we!?
Saith Susan: Who is to say that He didn't have evolution as His tool???
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, Susan ... most scientists I know seem ... at best ... to hedge on what
they really feel. Most of them honestly are at odds with what they have
been
taught and drilled, compared with what (perhaps little?) they remember from
their religions. If any scientist professes to be truthful, he admits that
there exists
no .. absolute NO .. proof of such things as human mankind devolving from
sub-species. That premise is purely the wishful, hopeful, ostensible
...(you pick
a word) ... explanation of something they have no definitive answer for,
except
for the age-old stories that I, and especially others of Jewish (or Gentile)
heritage
have been taught. For all the writings that I have studied (and that
amounts to
much, Susan), the best and most plausible answer remains in the Divine
Engineer.
Thoughful examination, study of artefact and history, and attention to
scripture
tells me the Pentatuch (at least) is God-breathed, and only penned by
mankind
by direction ...

Being a scientist myself .. and, a good one, I hope. I have to deal with
things
like laws of thermal dynamics. Mankind cannot create something from
nothing,
and especially so that he cannot create order from disorder. An omniscient
God can. He said so. Many penning the words of ... the scriptures we read,
lived
in times separated by hundred, or thousands of years, yet they wrote of the
same experiences and told the same stories.

Finally, evolution of the lower fauna may indeed have been created for
mankind
to have dominion, but not mankind. Mankind was created a little below the
angels. He said so. The big bang may have happened, too.
But, nowhere yet has man even imagined just how this could have occurred
if nothingness was all there was. Oh, but there WAS something. Think on
it.

I see that God surely did create it all, yet not understand how. And yet, I
can
understand the Why of it! You could, too, if only you would.
strixbubo
2004-03-06 17:49:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Your explanation is ridiculous. Palestinians have a darker skin because
they are the native population. They are culturally arabs now, but
Palestine was never an empty country, which means that present day
palestinians are the sons and daughters of those Jews who lived there in
roman times, and were later christianized, and for most islamized later.
On the other hand Israeli jews are a mixed breed. Many have some
palestinian blood, but all ashkenazi jews have native Europeans among
their ancestors, including Khazars converted to Judaism.
r***@bellsouth.net
2004-03-06 21:24:12 UTC
Permalink
Bullshit and more lies.
--
"I have seen the worst that man can do.and I can still laugh loudly"
R.J. Goldman

http://www.usidfvets.com
Post by strixbubo
Post by ginger
Because the so called Palestinian's are Arabs, and never arrived in
that part of the world until 635AD......2,837 years after the jews.
In the arabs early success of enslaving the populations of the
middle east and north Africa, they took slaves and interbred with
them.
Among the slaves they took were negroid peoples.
That is why, even the Jews whose lineage does not go out of the middle
east, are much fairer skinned than arabs. There is no negroid strain
in the jews.
Ginger
Your explanation is ridiculous. Palestinians have a darker skin because
they are the native population. They are culturally arabs now, but
Palestine was never an empty country, which means that present day
palestinians are the sons and daughters of those Jews who lived there in
roman times, and were later christianized, and for most islamized later.
On the other hand Israeli jews are a mixed breed. Many have some
palestinian blood, but all ashkenazi jews have native Europeans among
their ancestors, including Khazars converted to Judaism.
strixbubo
2004-03-06 23:27:17 UTC
Permalink
***@bellsouth.net wrote :
Bullshit and more lies.

nothing to add.
r***@bellsouth.net
2004-03-06 23:36:43 UTC
Permalink
no need to add it. you have blond blue eyed pallies red headed palies.
white black and other mixes of them
so take your lies and piss off
--
"I have seen the worst that man can do.and I can still laugh loudly"
R.J. Goldman

http://www.usidfvets.com
Post by r***@bellsouth.net
Bullshit and more lies.
nothing to add.
Susan Cohen
2004-03-07 05:56:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by strixbubo
Post by r***@bellsouth.net
Bullshit and more lies.
nothing to add.
Good. At least you admit it instead of trying to defend it.

Susan
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...